Distressed-Debt Manager Invictus Loses Control of Flagship Fund After Battle With Top Investors

Republished with full copyright permissions from The San Francisco Press.

The distressed-debt manager Invictus Global Management finds itself in the midst of a major upheaval, having lost control of its flagship fund following a fierce battle with its top investors. This development comes as a result of questionable investment strategies and alleged breaches of fiduciary duty that have shaken the foundations of the firm.

A Troubled Past:
Invictus Global Management came into prominence three years ago when it stepped in to assist NS8, a cyber-fraud detection operation with its own fraudulent practices. NS8’s founder and CEO had been fabricating revenue to attract investors, leading to his conviction and subsequent imprisonment. However, Invictus saw potential in NS8’s legal claims seeking restitution for the fraudulent practices, which prompted the firm to invest $10 million in the venture.

Allegations of Misconduct:
Alas, it appears that Invictus might have overlooked some similarities between NS8’s operational conduct and its own practices. While NS8 lacked the ability to detect its own fraud, Invictus faced accusations of spreading false information to creditors in an attempted acquisition case and reneging on a deal to purchase bankruptcy claims, resulting in a lawsuit filed by a prominent investment bank.

Fallout with Top Investors:
Investment partners Corbin Capital Partners and Gatewood Capital Partners, observing Invictus’ failing investment strategy and what they deemed as an unacceptable breach of fiduciary duty, severed ties with the firm. Citing “utter disregard of fiduciary obligations” and substantial financial losses, Corbin and Gatewood were compelled to remove Invictus as fund manager and pass control of the fund to Treo Asset Management.

Invictus Fights Back:
Finding itself on the receiving end of the fallout, Invictus plans to retaliate by filing a lawsuit against Gatewood, accusing them of exploitative tactics and misleading claims regarding fundraising abilities. The firm staunchly defends its performance and claims its removal as fund manager was unwarranted, causing it to resort to litigation to protect its reputation.

The Road Ahead:
While Invictus’ managers strategize to recoup their share of the fund’s capital and move forward, the future remains uncertain for this distressed-debt manager. This turn of events underscores the importance of fiduciary responsibility and due diligence in the financial services industry, as well as the potential consequences for those who fall short.

Leave a comment