Trump’s Reaction to Gag Order in Election Interference Case Raises Eyebrows

Republished with full copyright permissions from The San Francisco Press.

Last week, Judge Tanya Chutkan imposed a limited gag order in Donald Trump’s election interference case. The court noted that Trump’s public attacks on individuals involved in the case had resulted in threats and harassment towards them. Consequently, the judge prohibited Trump from commenting on Special Counsel Jack Smith, court staff members, foreseeable witnesses, or the substance of their testimonies.

Unsurprisingly, Trump responded vehemently to the gag order. During a campaign stop in Iowa, he complained that the judge essentially denied him the right to speak, insisting that Judge Chutkan had a personal animosity towards him.

Trump took to Truth Social, his preferred social media platform, to condemn the gag order, exclaiming, “A TERRIBLE THING HAPPENED TO DEMOCRACY TODAY – GAG ORDER!” He vowed to appeal the ruling and his lawyers filed an immediate appeal to the DC Circuit, further requesting a stay of the order pending appellate review.

In a swift response, Judge Chutkan granted an administrative stay, requiring the government to submit their opposition promptly, followed by a reply from Trump by Saturday.

While Trump continued his tirade against various ongoing criminal cases, he reinserted “deranged” Jack Smith into the spotlight, though his focus has primarily been on New York Attorney General Letitia James and Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron as his civil fraud trial unfolds in Manhattan. Notably, Trump faced consequences for a social media post falsely accusing Justice Engoron’s clerk of being Senator Chuck Schumer’s “girlfriend.” Justice Engoron fined Trump $5,000 for violating the prior order on this matter.

On Tuesday night, ABC News reported that Mark Meadows, former White House chief of staff, had been granted immunity to testify before the grand jury investigating the election interference case. While it was widely understood, though perhaps inaccurately, that Meadows had “flipped,” Trump embarked on a campaign to demonstrate to Judge Chutkan why he should be subjected to the gag order, also showcasing his erratic behavior.

Amidst Trump’s barrage of statements, it’s clear that he believes Meadows would not lie unless threatened by Jack Smith regarding his financial situation. Trump urged Meadows not to succumb to weakness and cowardice, warning him against betraying him. Furthermore, Trump insisted that Meadows had never declared the allegations of significant fraud during the rigged election as baseless, contradicting Meadows’ account in his book.

In a display of concerning behavior, Trump accused Justice Engoron of partisanship, claiming that the judge and his clerk harbored biases against him. This led to allegations of witness intimidation, which Trump’s lawyer, Chris Kise, attempted to downplay before Justice Engoron, who expressed concern for the well-being of his staff.

By flouting the existing gag order and engaging in witness intimidation, Trump undermines his argument against another gag order. It remains to be seen whether the New York judge’s response to these actions will deter Trump from further outbursts, allowing the DC prosecutors to proceed with their case unimpeded.

Overall, indications suggest that Trump’s handling of the gag order and his ongoing legal battles may result in unfavorable consequences. However, with the unpredictable nature of this situation, only time will tell.

Leave a comment