The ongoing criminal trial involving former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried has captivated the cryptocurrency community, shedding light on the relationship between FTX exchange and Alameda Research. Gary Wang, co-founder and former CTO of FTX, has provided crucial testimony revealing alleged special privileges and questionable practices.
FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried Allegedly Gave Alameda Research ‘Special Privileges’:
During his testimony, Wang conveyed an unsettling fact: Alameda Research had been granted unique trading privileges on the FTX exchange. It is alleged that Alameda’s account was permitted to trade more funds than it had available, thanks to an “allow negative” feature authorized by Bankman-Fried. This gave rise to an astounding revelation that Alameda maintained a negative balance greater than FTX’s revenue at a certain point in 2020. Wang also disclosed that he had increased Alameda’s line of credit to a staggering $65 billion, all under Bankman-Fried’s direction.
Misuse of Customer Funds:
The most concerning aspect of Wang’s testimony was his assertion that the funds used to support Alameda’s negative balance came directly from FTX customers. Wang clarified that these customers had not provided consent for their funds to be utilized in this manner. This raises serious ethical and legal questions about the transparency and responsibility of FTX in handling customer assets.
SBF’s Misleading Statements:
Further adding to the complexity of the case was Wang’s affirmation that Bankman-Fried had made public statements implying that Alameda Research was treated on par with other users and that FTX funds were not being utilized by the research firm. Wang pointed out a 2019 tweet by Bankman-Fried, explicitly stating that Alameda did not draw funds from FTX. Interestingly, Wang testified that Bankman-Fried had ordered the integration of the “allow negative” feature on the same day as the tweet.
Potential Implications for the Crypto Industry:
These revelations have significant ramifications for the cryptocurrency industry as a whole, undermining trust in FTX and raising concerns about the use of customer funds. The integration of features that offer advantages to specific users fundamentally contradicts the principles of fairness and equality that should govern cryptocurrency exchanges.
As the trial proceeds, the spotlight continues to shine on the intricate dynamics between FTX exchange and Alameda Research. Wang’s testimony has shed light on alleged special privileges and the misuse of customer funds. These revelations serve as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency, integrity, and accountability within the crypto industry. As the trial unfolds, it remains to be seen how the involvement of other former FTX and Alameda executives will shape the narrative, and whether justice will prevail in holding all accountable for their actions.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this research report is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial or investment advice. The NFT and cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and readers should conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions.

