Almost a year after the death of Mahsa Amini in the custody of Iran’s “morality police” sparked widespread protests, Iranian MPs are now advocating for a new bill that aims to impose stricter penalties on women for violating the enforced modesty laws. The proposed Hijab and Chastity Bill, consisting of 70 articles, seeks to intensify punishments for those seen flouting the dress code that has become a symbol of resistance against the Islamic Republic.
The Hijab and Chastity Bill introduces several measures to strengthen the enforcement of dress codes. It calls for increased fines, longer jail terms, and even the use of artificial intelligence to identify violators. These measures build upon previous efforts, such as the installation of cameras in public places, to crack down on strict dress codes and identify unveiled women. A recent straw poll in Iran’s parliament saw 175 members voting in favor of the bill, although 49 voted against it. If approved by Iran’s Guardian Council, the bill will undergo a pilot phase before potentially becoming permanent law.
The compulsory hijab has been ingrained in Iranian society since the 1979 revolution, symbolizing the regime’s control and authority. However, in the wake of last year’s protests, an increasing number of women have been defying the dress code as an act of resistance. Experts argue that the proposed bill aims to use financial coercion to discourage women from collective activism. By imposing hefty fines and penalties on businesses, celebrities, and public figures who support such acts of defiance, the bill reinforces gender apartheid and treats women as second-class citizens.
The bill’s proponents have leveraged Article 85 of Iran’s constitution to bypass public debate and push the legislation forward without scrutiny. The use of this article, originally intended for laws requiring expert opinions, has drawn concerns from critics who believe the government is reluctant to openly discuss a matter that has garnered global attention and resulted in significant arrests and fatalities. Despite some voices of dissent within Iran’s parliamentary ranks, the government prefers secrecy, signaling its awareness of potential backlash but also a determination to maintain control.
Women who challenge modesty laws, human rights defenders advocating for their rights, and journalists covering the movement have all faced persecution. The proposed bill sends a strong message to dissidents that the government will not back down. Actors who removed their hijabs were labeled mentally ill and subjected to enforced psychological treatments. The bill can be seen as the regime’s attempt to assert its authority and demonstrate to onlookers, both domestic and international, that it remains in control. However, despite potential consequences, many Iranians continue to persevere in their fight for change.
As the Iranian government inches closer to passing the controversial Hijab and Chastity Bill, concerns over the further deterioration of women’s rights intensify. The proposed legislation not only seeks to tighten the enforcement of existing dress codes but also aims to curb collective activism through financial coercion. By resorting to secrecy and avoiding public debate, the government hopes to minimize opposition but risks miscalculating the determination of those seeking change. Ultimately, this bill represents a pivotal moment for Iran and its citizens as they navigate the ongoing struggle between oppressive laws and the pursuit of freedom.
Market Capital Research 