Written by Hazel J. Greene, Senior Analyst

The recent Ripple ruling has thrust John Reed Stark, former director of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Office of Internet Enforcement, into the spotlight as a prominent figure cautioning the cryptocurrency industry. While this judgment was seen by many as a setback for the SEC, Stark’s reservations about its stability and potential for appeals and reversals deserve careful consideration.

Advising against premature jubilation, Stark called for caution in an article that sparked thoughtful discussions on July 14. His viewpoint holds weight due to his extensive knowledge and experience in securities law. Despite the initial euphoria, Stark argues that the Ripple decision should not be hastily celebrated as a tremendous victory for the cryptocurrency industry.

Is the Ripple Jubilation Temporary?

Stark stated, “But IMHO, the decision resides on shaky ground, will likely be appealed at some point, will likely result in reversal and is not necessarily a cause for celebration. (Please don’t kill the messenger.)”

He highlights that the decision’s legal foundation is far from solid, leaving room for legal challenges that could lead to a different outcome. The court categorized Ripple’s offering into three sections: Institutional Sales, Programmatic Sales, and Other Sales, as reported by Reuters on July 13, 2023.

Stark emphasizes that the court deemed the sale of XRP to institutional investors, which it considered a security, as an illegal sale of securities. Consequently, these investors have the right to rescind, and Ripple may face a hefty fine estimated at $720 million for this infraction.

Violating the SEC’s Mission and Authority

Stark contends that the Ripple ruling not only undermines the SEC’s mission and authority but also raises contentious issues from various perspectives. Firstly, he disapproves of the SEC’s unequal protection offered to institutional and ordinary investors. The potential disparity in safeguards raises concerns about whether the choice to protect all investors has been consistent.

Moreover, Stark questions a theory proposed in the Ripple ruling that argues securities laws are not relevant when Ripple sells its tokens through an exchange, as it assumes that the exchange’s users are unaware of the issuer. However, Stark maintains that utilizing investor ignorance or inadequate research as a defense for securities breaches is unjustified. He asserts that individual investors likely have access to the same information as institutional investors regarding Ripple’s objectives, even if they may not be fully aware of it.

Regulatory Clarity in the Cryptocurrency Industry

As someone who has previously supported the SEC and emphasized the importance of investors adhering to the law, Stark highlights that regulatory clarity in the cryptocurrency industry is still evolving. He urges the cryptocurrency community to advocate for regulations and avoid engaging in personal attacks or making derogatory remarks.

The post “A Cautionary Tale of Ripple Crypto Euphoria in the Cryptocurrency Industry” appeared first on Market Capital Research.